Border-Walls, Fire-Walls, Sea-Walls
Global-Cultural Resources as Limits
How do walls—man-made and otherwise—define global-cultural limits? How do the physical/material characteristics of walls bear on/inform/reflect/etc. their religious, political, social, and economic meanings, and vice versa? How do walls mark cultural relations of infinity and finiteness, abundance and lack, presence and absence, etc.? What kinds of cultural dynamics are generated in/by walls? What kinds of cultural (self-)reflections might be delimited, inscribed, or circumscribed in/by walls?
“Premodern Border-Walls, Fire-Walls, Sea-Walls: Global-Cultural Resources as Limits,” with guest speaker, Historian David Frye, author of Walls: A History of Civilization in Blood and Brick (Simon & Schuster).
1. Lecture by Professor Frye on October 9, 2019, at 5:00-6:45 pm in Dauer 219 (Ruth McQuown Room and via the livestream link below):
“How Ancient Walls begat Modern Barriers.”
To access the edited and recorded lecture, click here: https://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/08714d2a11134a3892db33fbb7767e921d
2. Panel Discussion with Professor Frye and UF faculty on October 10, 2019, at 5:00-6:45 pm in Dauer 219 (Ruth McQuown Room and via the livestream link below):
“Premodern Walls: Literal and Figurative Functions.”
With presentations by Eleni Bozia (Classics): “‘All Roads Lead to Rome’: When your Walls Include the World”; Nina Caputo (History): “Real and Imagined Walls in Premodern Jewish Culture”; Florin Curta (History): “Justinian’s Walls and the Ethnogenesis of the Slavs”; Ashley Jones (Art History): “Gemstones and the Walls of the Heavenly Jerusalem”; and Richard Wang (Languages, Literatures, and Cultures): “Ethnic and Religious Interactions along the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty.” Moderated by Mary Watt (Languages, Literatures, and Cultures).
To access the edited and recorded Panel Discussion with presentations by UF faculty, click here: : https://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/67f330e3413f485da5dbb5e30beff6621d
Livestreamed and recorded by the Sustainable Online Network for Global Cultural Studies. Contact organizer Will Hasty <email@example.com> with questions.
The Fall 2019 Campus Weeks Events were sponsored by the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany, UF’s “Imagineering and the Technosphere” Mellon Intersections Group (also see here), the Imagining Climate Change Initiative, and UF’s Center for Medieval and Early Modern Studies; with additional support from the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, the University of Florida International Center, the Center for European Studies, the Department of Spanish and Portuguese Studies, and the Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures.
Do you have any comments about this topic? Fill out the form below to join the discussion.
My question on the lecture pertains to the discussion of anxiety and warriors. At one point Professor Frye stated there has been research done on how people exposed to stressors exhibit less anxiety over them versus someone who avoids the stressor. I believe this is why in military training people are exposed to many stressors and extreme conditions, so as to ensure that if they have to go to war they will be able to handle the stress of the environment. But my question is, for those that are exposed to their stressor and are trained to not exhibit anxiety from it, why do some still receive long term negative effects from it even though they went through the training? This specifically relates to PTSD for those who have been in war zones. Even though they were repeatedly exposed to harsh conditions and stress to help lower anxiety levels when in war zones, some people still get PTSD and heightened anxiety levels instead. Why does this occur?
April 24, 2020